RME ADI-2-4 Pro SE
After testing in the benchmark mode in the Reference Audio Analyzer software, the data is added to the online database of the RAA website.
You can view the test results on the comparison pages
and summary reports for beginners
and professionals.
You can go to the desired report or comparison/selection service through the menu on this page. Additionally, you can go to the comparison pages from any graph from reports and add other tested products for direct comparison.
RME ADI-2-4 Pro SE is available in reports and services. You are on the title page of the reports and services.
Information for entry level users
Information for all
Versus of characteristics
- Comparison of amplifiers by loudness (Volume Level)
- Comparison of the optimal range of volume control
Information for professionals
reports for a pro (DAC Line Out)
- Brickwal
- NOS ( recorded slow)
- NOS
- Sharp
- Short Delay Low Dispersion
- Short Delay Sharp
- Short Delay Slow
- Slow
- ADC
- Frequency response - Headphone amplifier
- Comparison of basic characteristics
- Impedance
- Comparison of the frequency response/SPL of the bundles of headphones and amplifiers
- Voltage and Sensitivity
- Frequency response - DAC Line Out
- Crosstalk
- Crosstalk Phase
- Harmonic Distortion vs Level
- Spectra
- Impulse response
- Waveforms
More detailed
Measurements of RME ADI-2-4 Pro SE were carried out by Roman Kuznetsov on the hardware-software complex RAA.
The RME ADI-2-4 Pro SE test was conducted as a black box test, without regard to cost and prestige. This is the basic principle for making measurements, measurement reports and developing tests in RAA.
I believe that it is important to do not make an absolute assessment of the device, but an aggregate assessment when working together with a headphones and taking into account external factors. This allows you to effectively reveal the potential of the entire set of devices or to make a more optimal choice of components.
Kuznetsov Roman
Founder of RAA
Information for Authors. You can freely use the graphics in your articles with a link to us.
Наконец дошли руки до обработки отчета АЦП от RME ADI-2-4 Pro SE.
Если не изменяет память, то мы тогда в качестве источника использовали E-MU1616m, у которой нет сюрпризов в виде ESS hump и прочих странностей, но условно не самые низкие уровни гармоник низких порядков.
Это как выглядит оцифровка одной 1616m на другую 1616m
https://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/report/dac/e-mu-1616m.php
А это с 1616m на RME ADI-2-4 Pro SE
https://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/report/dac/rme-adi-24-adc.php
Итого, RME ADI-2-4 Pro SE получше с точки зрения сигнал/шум и может быть будет лучше для получения такого параметра как SINAD на уровнях около 0 dBFS, но линейность в виде лишних искажений хромает. Предварительно искажения ниже, чем у E1DA Cosmos, но принципиально с точки зрения линейности - хуже, чем 1616m. Так что 1616m пока полноценно не на что менять...
Интересно было бы протестировать Lynx Hilo ...