The table shows a most important technical characteristics of EarSonic SM3v2
*Center channel headphone is received by averaging between left and right channels
The report contains the complete data
Version report: V2
Version report: V1 (Stands: HDM1, SF, SIEC)Version report: V2 (Stands: HDM-X, SIEC)
- Frequency response
- Impedance
- Sensitivity
- Electric phase
- Frequency response of amplifier with constant output resistance
- Variation in frequency response with amplifiers with constant output resistance
- Frequency response with an amplifier with zero output resistance and raising of output resistance in low frequencies
- Variation in frequency response an amplifier with zero output resistance with raising-up of output resistance in low frequencies
- Perception of headphone frequency response curves of equal loudness ISO 226-2009
Stands HDM1 and SF replaced by HDM-X stand.
Measurements in the extended frequency range 10 - 45000 Hz
- Impulse response
- Step response
- Impulse Response Envelope (ETC - Energy Time Curve)
- QSD / Watterfall
- Delta QSD / Delta Watterfall
The sensitivity was calculated by data from the measuring stand SIEC
*Center channel is received by data averaging between the left and right channels
*Center channel is received by data averaging between the left and right channels
The Earsonics SM3v2 test was conducted as a black box test, without regard to cost and prestige. This is the basic principle for making measurements, measurement reports and developing tests in RAA.
I believe that it is important to do not make an absolute assessment of the device, but an aggregate assessment when working together with a source amplifier and taking into account external factors. This allows you to effectively reveal the potential of the entire set of devices or to make a more optimal choice of components.